Calzaghe - Reid

Ben · Post by **Ben** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:36 pm

Mayz wrote:
Tommy wrote:
Mayz wrote: Once again Tommy, thats pretty silly comment after your 'ref attack' on me and all this banning nonsense.
You of all people telling folk here to not make excuses is flaming at it's best. Nearly every debate you're involved in ends up in the pit what does that tell you?
I'm just sad good posters like Jillgas and Roadblock are gone while the village idiots you and Crimson run rampant here.
Yeah Tommy, according to my search, you're actually in more thread in The Pit than me! Odd that hey!

That might be because of the level of retardation of threads you participated in was just too much and they were simply deleted...

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:40 pm

Ben wrote:
Mayz wrote:
Tommy wrote: You of all people telling folk here to not make excuses is flaming at it's best. Nearly every debate you're involved in ends up in the pit what does that tell you?
I'm just sad good posters like Jillgas and Roadblock are gone while the village idiots you and Crimson run rampant here.
Yeah Tommy, according to my search, you're actually in more thread in The Pit than me! Odd that hey!
That might be because of the level of retardation of threads you participated in was just too much and they were simply deleted...

My, my someone is desperate to flame!

Behave Ben, it'll be ok.

the13r · Post by **the13r** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:42 pm

might be simpler to just let go guys

ok, back to playing LEGOs guys!

Tommy · Post by **Tommy** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:45 pm

Mayz wrote:
Yeah Tommy, according to my search, you're actually in more thread in The Pit than me! Odd that hey! Don't worry, the mind can make up things when its upset like Mayz's threads always go to The Pit and Roadblock was a good poster. Delusion gets the best of us.

I start off topic threads in the pit where they belong.

Tommy · Post by **Tommy** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:55 pm

Ben wrote:there's never any rational reasoning for what he says unless something has been analyzed by Lurky previously.

That about sums it up, he was way out of his depth while debating my good friend Roadblock that he resorted to name calling and then got RB banned for giving some back. Well this place is poorer for it as he knows a lot more about Aussie boxing than I do.

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:04 pm

Tommy wrote:
Ben wrote:there's never any rational reasoning for what he says unless something has been analyzed by Lurky previously.
That about sums it up, he was way out of his depth while debating my good friend Roadblock that he resorted to name calling and then got RB banned for giving some back. Well this place is poorer for it as he knows a lot more about Aussie boxing than I do.

Roadblock was the biggest troll on the board and was pretty damn thick, don't sell yourself short Tommy, you're much better than that! Btw I have about as much power to ban someone on this board as you have (none!), I don't know what can give you that impression, I haven't debated with Roadblock in months and I wouldn't since he talks a load of shit! I just couldn't be arsed with the guy. If I could ban him I would have the day he joined!

I see now why you are trying to aimlessly attack me now though, you blame me for his departure, I promise you it had nothing to do me mate, so take your lies and put them away.

boxingfan1984 · Post by **boxingfan1984** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:21 pm

Mayz wrote:
kinggrissly wrote:
Mayz wrote:You don't see how Calzaghe was fighting stupid against Bika? He didn't want that fight and clearly didn't know much about Bika.
Then why did he give up a belt to fight him in an optional defense in his HBO debut? I thought he looked fine, by the way, but I don't see why he fought him.
Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:24 pm

boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote:
kinggrissly wrote: Then why did he give up a belt to fight him in an optional defense in his HBO debut? I thought he looked fine, by the way, but I don't see why he fought him.
Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.

Oh well.

boxingfan1984 · Post by **boxingfan1984** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:25 pm

Mayz wrote:
boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote: Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.
Oh well, shit happens.

Its definately your right but I cant figure out how the ref ruined that fight for Hatton. All the myths were wrong. Floyd was stronger and Hatton couldnt bull him. I respect you but whatever...

kinggrissly · Post by **kinggrissly** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:28 pm

Mayz wrote:Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him

Props for the first honest thing you've ever written here.

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:28 pm

boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote:
kinggrissly wrote: Then why did he give up a belt to fight him in an optional defense in his HBO debut? I thought he looked fine, by the way, but I don't see why he fought him.
Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.

Not an attack on bad spellers btw, I make enough mistakes myself, just think that if people are going to use the word 'ridiculous', they spell it the right way, after all spelling it wrong is pretty ridiculous. I didn't mean this as an insult btw! Just advice! Hope that didn't come out wrong!

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:33 pm

boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote:
boxingfan1984 wrote:
Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.
Oh well, shit happens.
Its definately your right but I cant figure out how the ref ruined that fight for Hatton. All the myths were wrong. Floyd was stronger and Hatton couldnt bull him. I respect you but whatever...

The best way to explain it is if I knew Cortez was going to ref like that, I wouldn't have picked Hatton to win. The ref situation was pretty obvious from the start of the fight. We all know that Floyd is a superb boxer and breaking them constantly would hurt Hatton - and it did. I was literally tearing my hair out watching the fight live, it was just an awful display. As for the sigs, they are over the top, but they are suppose to be for a laugh, truth is the ref was poor, my sigs are only a parody of that.

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:34 pm

kinggrissly wrote:
Mayz wrote:Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him
Props for the first honest thing you've ever written here.

I'll let you know when you've come up with one!

Chi_Box · Post by **Chi_Box** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:07 pm

boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote:
kinggrissly wrote: Then why did he give up a belt to fight him in an optional defense in his HBO debut? I thought he looked fine, by the way, but I don't see why he fought him.
Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.

i never noticed them..

mekane · Post by **mekane** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:34 pm

Okay, I'll just admit I must be grasping at straws with this post if not a single person on this entire board can agree with me - I think thats a pretty good sign.

Mayz · Post by **Mayz** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:26 am

Chi_Box wrote:
boxingfan1984 wrote:
Mayz wrote: Obviously Bika was chosen because Joe can box circles around him, but Joe decided to impress the US TV cameras instead of boxing clever. It's a major complement to Joe that you think he was fine when he fought a terrible fight btw.

Your avatar and sig are rediculous. I hate them.

i never noticed them..

I know you never notice the ref..

FightFanAL · Post by **FightFanAL** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:35 am

mekane wrote:Okay, I'll just admit I must be grasping at straws with this post if not a single person on this entire board can agree with me - I think thats a pretty good sign.

mekane,

you're not grasping at straws man,you tried to give a honest analysis of what the fight might look like based on previous fights that Calzaghe and Hopkins have been in.unforunately,like every calzaghe and hopkins thread it devolved into insults questioning the other fighters resumes and somehow mayweather and hatton lol.

the13r · Post by **the13r** » Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:12 pm

OTD 1999

FightFanAL · Post by **FightFanAL** » Wed Feb 14, 2024 10:59 pm

Man I forgot how childish some of these arguments used to get lol.

The 13th Round

Calzaghe - Reid

Re: Calzaghe - Reid

Re: Calzaghe - Reid