Who Won Pavlik vs Taylor II ?
Who Won Pavlik vs Taylor II ?
Just want to get the pulse of what the general concensus is on teh fight.Wh
- straycat
- TTR Superfights Challenge #9 Champion
- Posts: 27547
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: We Miss You Buddy, Though You're Gone You Are Not Forgotten!
- Contact:
Draw
Hats off to JT. My oppinion changed quite a bit favorably.
The non tittle 164 thing may of left the door open to quitely keep Kellys rising popularity intact.
Look for Pavlik unification serries to be Arums latest money making venture.
Hats off to JT. My oppinion changed quite a bit favorably.
The non tittle 164 thing may of left the door open to quitely keep Kellys rising popularity intact.
Look for Pavlik unification serries to be Arums latest money making venture.
Ĩ ÁM ŚŤŔÁŶČÁŤ ÁŃĎ Ĩ ÁPPŔŐVĔ ŤĤĨŚ MĔŚŚÁĞĔ
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
ScapposeJohn commenting on Shane Mosely possibly being unaware he was taking PED's wrote: Likewise. It reminds me of President Clinton saying that he smoked weed in college but never inhaled. Yeah..........right.
I hadnt watched the fight till this morning but I had Pavlik winning a close ud. Although Taylor had improved since the last fight he still takes such long periods of almost every round off. IMO its hard to give rounds to a person that fights like that when his opponent is more active throughout nearly the whole round, the whole fight. Just depends what you like to see I guess, weither its short flashy flurries or consistant steady work.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:01 pm
-
- TTR Rankings & Results Editor
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:22 pm
- Location: Valley Stream, New York
The non-title bout was something Taylor's people insisted on prior to Taylor defending against Pavlik. They could not legally insist on a rematch with the middleweight title on the line because Pavlik was the mandatory contender. Rematch clauses (involving the title) are prohibited when a champion is defending against a mandatory challenger.straycat wrote:Draw
Hats off to JT. My oppinion changed quite a bit favorably.
The non tittle 164 thing may of left the door open to quitely keep Kellys rising popularity intact.
Look for Pavlik unification serries to be Arums latest money making venture.
Pavlik agreed to the non-title rematch because his management was afraid Taylor's people would have him vacate and move to 168 unless the catchweight rematch clause was accepted. Pavlik would have still been able to fight for either the WBC or WBO title (not both because the two organizations had different #2 contenders: WBC- Giovanni Lorenzo, WBO- Gary Lockett) but would have been fighting for a vacant alphabet soup title rather than the lineal version that went along with Taylor's WBC and WBO belts.
-
- MODERATOR
- Posts: 5224
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
I scored the fight 117 to 111 for Pavlik. But like Lurkster said, on a different thread, the disparity in points doesn't carry over to Taylor not giving a good fight. Some rounds were close and how they ended up being scored can vary depending on each person's interpretation. Taylor did well, but lost on points in quite a few rounds, although still deserves credit for his performance is my take on it.
"A champion, a true champion is to take on all capable challengers. A true champion defends his title, and looks for matches that pose a threat in order to prove to the world he deserves to be called the best of the best."
-
- MODERATOR
- Posts: 5224
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
Taylor retiring seems a little overboard to me. To say that he gets annihilated by anyone at super middleweight is simply outrageous. He's still young and can rise up from the adversities he has faced. And if he can, then that makes him even better than what he was before. In other words I wouldn't count him out yet but, instead, wait and see how he handles his situation.Juggalotus wrote:I had Pavlik winning pretty clearly on points. And I think JT needs to retire. There's nowhere for him to go. He can't go back down to middleweight really, he's done there, and he can't hang with Pavlik. If he moves up to Super Middleweight he gets annihilated by anyone.
"A champion, a true champion is to take on all capable challengers. A true champion defends his title, and looks for matches that pose a threat in order to prove to the world he deserves to be called the best of the best."
I had it 116-112 but could have easily gave Pavlik a couple more rounds so I see nothing wrong with your score.scappoosejohn wrote:I scored the fight 117 to 111 for Pavlik. But like Lurkster said, on a different thread, the disparity in points doesn't carry over to Taylor not giving a good fight. Some rounds were close and how they ended up being scored can vary depending on each person's interpretation. Taylor did well, but lost on points in quite a few rounds, although still deserves credit for his performance is my take on it.
Taylor improved a lot and had much better head movement but lets be honest he was still getting tagged a lot. He has a lot of natural ability but he does nothing great. He has speed but he doesn't use it, his power is average and his defense went from non existent to okay.
It was an entertaining bout yesterday but the standard was a few notches below Calzaghe Kessler.
- straycat
- TTR Superfights Challenge #9 Champion
- Posts: 27547
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: We Miss You Buddy, Though You're Gone You Are Not Forgotten!
- Contact:
Thanks for your input KSTAT:KSTAT124 wrote:The non-title bout was something Taylor's people insisted on prior to Taylor defending against Pavlik. They could not legally insist on a rematch with the middleweight title on the line because Pavlik was the mandatory contender. Rematch clauses (involving the title) are prohibited when a champion is defending against a mandatory challenger.straycat wrote:Draw
Hats off to JT. My oppinion changed quite a bit favorably.
The non tittle 164 thing may of left the door open to quitely keep Kellys rising popularity intact.
Look for Pavlik unification serries to be Arums latest money making venture.
Pavlik agreed to the non-title rematch because his management was afraid Taylor's people would have him vacate and move to 168 unless the catchweight rematch clause was accepted. Pavlik would have still been able to fight for either the WBC or WBO title (not both because the two organizations had different #2 contenders: WBC- Giovanni Lorenzo, WBO- Gary Lockett) but would have been fighting for a vacant alphabet soup title rather than the lineal version that went along with Taylor's WBC and WBO belts.
I did'nt intend to sound like I was making any rasberrie sounds here. I realize this was Taylors desires to have the remacth clause at a 164, maybe if he put a title remacth things could of been viewed differently. the belts could of changed hands and lead to a third fight. Thats where I was going with it.
Ĩ ÁM ŚŤŔÁŶČÁŤ ÁŃĎ Ĩ ÁPPŔŐVĔ ŤĤĨŚ MĔŚŚÁĞĔ
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
ScapposeJohn commenting on Shane Mosely possibly being unaware he was taking PED's wrote: Likewise. It reminds me of President Clinton saying that he smoked weed in college but never inhaled. Yeah..........right.
-
- MODERATOR
- Posts: 5224
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
That's pretty much how I saw it. But what gets me is that a lot are saying a score of 117-111 is outrageous and still don't argue a score of 116-112. That's only a difference of giving one more round to Taylor instead of Pavlik for a 116-112. I'm thinking that some people see the numbers without doing the arithmetic.Tommy wrote:I had it 116-112 but could have easily gave Pavlik a couple more rounds so I see nothing wrong with your score.scappoosejohn wrote:I scored the fight 117 to 111 for Pavlik. But like Lurkster said, on a different thread, the disparity in points doesn't carry over to Taylor not giving a good fight. Some rounds were close and how they ended up being scored can vary depending on each person's interpretation. Taylor did well, but lost on points in quite a few rounds, although still deserves credit for his performance is my take on it.
Taylor improved a lot and had much better head movement but lets be honest he was still getting tagged a lot. He has a lot of natural ability but he does nothing great. He has speed but he doesn't use it, his power is average and his defense went from non existent to okay.
It was an entertaining bout yesterday but the standard was a few notches below Calzaghe Kessler.
"A champion, a true champion is to take on all capable challengers. A true champion defends his title, and looks for matches that pose a threat in order to prove to the world he deserves to be called the best of the best."
scappoosejohn wrote:That's pretty much how I saw it. But what gets me is that a lot are saying a score of 117-111 is outrageous and still don't argue a score of 116-112. That's only a difference of giving one more round to Taylor instead of Pavlik for a 116-112. I'm thinking that some people see the numbers without doing the arithmetic.Tommy wrote:I had it 116-112 but could have easily gave Pavlik a couple more rounds so I see nothing wrong with your score.scappoosejohn wrote:I scored the fight 117 to 111 for Pavlik. But like Lurkster said, on a different thread, the disparity in points doesn't carry over to Taylor not giving a good fight. Some rounds were close and how they ended up being scored can vary depending on each person's interpretation. Taylor did well, but lost on points in quite a few rounds, although still deserves credit for his performance is my take on it.
Taylor improved a lot and had much better head movement but lets be honest he was still getting tagged a lot. He has a lot of natural ability but he does nothing great. He has speed but he doesn't use it, his power is average and his defense went from non existent to okay.
It was an entertaining bout yesterday but the standard was a few notches below Calzaghe Kessler.
Lol 117/111 I have a problem with. It is outrageous lol.
Yeah the way I see it Pavlik dominated every round (bar rd 10 which was all Taylor) with his aggression and work rate. Taylor was fighting in spurts and trying to steal the rds. I thought he did enough to steal 3 to give him a total of 4.scappoosejohn wrote:That's pretty much how I saw it. But what gets me is that a lot are saying a score of 117-111 is outrageous and still don't argue a score of 116-112. That's only a difference of giving one more round to Taylor instead of Pavlik for a 116-112. I'm thinking that some people see the numbers without doing the arithmetic.Tommy wrote:I had it 116-112 but could have easily gave Pavlik a couple more rounds so I see nothing wrong with your score.scappoosejohn wrote:I scored the fight 117 to 111 for Pavlik. But like Lurkster said, on a different thread, the disparity in points doesn't carry over to Taylor not giving a good fight. Some rounds were close and how they ended up being scored can vary depending on each person's interpretation. Taylor did well, but lost on points in quite a few rounds, although still deserves credit for his performance is my take on it.
Taylor improved a lot and had much better head movement but lets be honest he was still getting tagged a lot. He has a lot of natural ability but he does nothing great. He has speed but he doesn't use it, his power is average and his defense went from non existent to okay.
It was an entertaining bout yesterday but the standard was a few notches below Calzaghe Kessler.
Fighting in spurts is dangerous and Taylor wasn't slick enough to pull it off against Kelly.
- straycat
- TTR Superfights Challenge #9 Champion
- Posts: 27547
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: We Miss You Buddy, Though You're Gone You Are Not Forgotten!
- Contact:
The 117 111 thing was kind of funny in some instances, but all in the eye of who's accountabilty mattered the most, the one who was picked to judge the fight.
With Cotto/Mosely it was good enough for the judges to give Cooto rounds when all he did was land a harder shot than Mosely even though the shot it's self did little to detract Mosely from what he was doing in that round. {BTW I had Mosely in that fight}
With this fight, Taylor was able in a few rounds to land bigger shots that in some instances took Kelly out of the offensive posture he was in and had him trying to cover up and change what he was doing.
With Cotto/Mosely it was good enough for the judges to give Cooto rounds when all he did was land a harder shot than Mosely even though the shot it's self did little to detract Mosely from what he was doing in that round. {BTW I had Mosely in that fight}
With this fight, Taylor was able in a few rounds to land bigger shots that in some instances took Kelly out of the offensive posture he was in and had him trying to cover up and change what he was doing.
Ĩ ÁM ŚŤŔÁŶČÁŤ ÁŃĎ Ĩ ÁPPŔŐVĔ ŤĤĨŚ MĔŚŚÁĞĔ
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
>^^< ŚŤŔÚŤ!
ScapposeJohn commenting on Shane Mosely possibly being unaware he was taking PED's wrote: Likewise. It reminds me of President Clinton saying that he smoked weed in college but never inhaled. Yeah..........right.
-
- MODERATOR
- Posts: 5224
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
So what was your score? And is 116-112 a fair score? Just curious.RASTA666 wrote:scappoosejohn wrote:That's pretty much how I saw it. But what gets me is that a lot are saying a score of 117-111 is outrageous and still don't argue a score of 116-112. That's only a difference of giving one more round to Taylor instead of Pavlik for a 116-112. I'm thinking that some people see the numbers without doing the arithmetic.Tommy wrote: I had it 116-112 but could have easily gave Pavlik a couple more rounds so I see nothing wrong with your score.
Taylor improved a lot and had much better head movement but lets be honest he was still getting tagged a lot. He has a lot of natural ability but he does nothing great. He has speed but he doesn't use it, his power is average and his defense went from non existent to okay.
It was an entertaining bout yesterday but the standard was a few notches below Calzaghe Kessler.
Lol 117/111 I have a problem with. It is outrageous lol.
"A champion, a true champion is to take on all capable challengers. A true champion defends his title, and looks for matches that pose a threat in order to prove to the world he deserves to be called the best of the best."
scappoosejohn wrote:So what was your score? And is 116-112 a fair score? Just curious.RASTA666 wrote:scappoosejohn wrote: That's pretty much how I saw it. But what gets me is that a lot are saying a score of 117-111 is outrageous and still don't argue a score of 116-112. That's only a difference of giving one more round to Taylor instead of Pavlik for a 116-112. I'm thinking that some people see the numbers without doing the arithmetic.
Lol 117/111 I have a problem with. It is outrageous lol.
I lean to a split for Kelly. Scap 117/111 is close to a shut out? I believe the right guy won. 115/113 across the board is still a ud.
117/111 suggests something that never happened.
-
- MODERATOR
- Posts: 5224
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
I'm not suggesting that something never happened. To the contrary, there were close rounds although I gave them to Pavlik. Taylor gave it a good shot but fell short and the rounds I gave him were 2,3 and 10. Also, I can understand that others would of given more rounds to Jermaine depending on their own interpretation of scoring.RASTA666 wrote:scappoosejohn wrote:So what was your score? And is 116-112 a fair score? Just curious.RASTA666 wrote:
Lol 117/111 I have a problem with. It is outrageous lol.
I lean to a split for Kelly. Scap 117/111 is close to a shut out? I believe the right guy won. 115/113 across the board is still a ud.
117/111 suggests something that never happened.
I'm aware that many will disagree with me but that's how I viewed the fight.
"A champion, a true champion is to take on all capable challengers. A true champion defends his title, and looks for matches that pose a threat in order to prove to the world he deserves to be called the best of the best."
scappoosejohn wrote:I'm not suggesting that something never happened. To the contrary, there were close rounds although I gave them to Pavlik. Taylor gave it a good shot but fell short and the rounds I gave him were 2,3 and 10. Also, I can understand that others would of given more rounds to Jermaine depending on their own interpretation of scoring.RASTA666 wrote:scappoosejohn wrote: So what was your score? And is 116-112 a fair score? Just curious.
I lean to a split for Kelly. Scap 117/111 is close to a shut out? I believe the right guy won. 115/113 across the board is still a ud.
117/111 suggests something that never happened.
I'm aware that many will disagree with me but that's how I viewed the fight.
Fair enough. I never saw a 9 rd to 3 fight.