SPENCE defeated PORTER SATURDAY
SPENCE defeated PORTER SATURDAY
https://www.boxingscene.com/shawn-porte ... xt--137438
snippet from the article:
Porter (30-2-1, 17 KOs) has pushed for a welterweight unification showdown with Spence (25-0, 21 KOs) the past few weeks. On Sunday, Porter revealed that his request might be granted soon.
“I think we got Errol Spence next. We’ll see,” Porter told reporters in Oxon Hill, Maryland, before Sergey Lipinets defeated Lamont Peterson.
Porter had another nugget before taking his ringside seat: “Oh yeah, it’s a pay-per-view fight.”
my comment: LOL. Big surprise.
snippet from the article:
Porter (30-2-1, 17 KOs) has pushed for a welterweight unification showdown with Spence (25-0, 21 KOs) the past few weeks. On Sunday, Porter revealed that his request might be granted soon.
“I think we got Errol Spence next. We’ll see,” Porter told reporters in Oxon Hill, Maryland, before Sergey Lipinets defeated Lamont Peterson.
Porter had another nugget before taking his ringside seat: “Oh yeah, it’s a pay-per-view fight.”
my comment: LOL. Big surprise.
- jeff_lacy_ko
- Posts: 9048
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:46 pm
- Location: milwaukee,wi
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
Yup.... al doesn't have enough cash to pay Errol to fight a name. Its an economic necessity for him at this point
-
- Posts: 8230
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:50 pm
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
Really wanted Spence-Thurman, but I'll take Spence-Porter...but please not on PPV!!!
At least we'll get a unification though.
At least we'll get a unification though.
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
The Spence/Garcia ppv success was a case of good news/bad news. If it hadn't done as well as it did, there's no way this would be ppv. We would either get a better fight (Spence/Crawford or Spence/Thurman) or a non-ppv fight.
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
Felt the same way about Spence v Garcia, but the stream in the living room was pretty good so that’s my new go to. Would be nice to watch on free tv without the threat of a stream freezing up, but I ain’t paying for a ppv unless it’s a ppv worthy fightHillsinitialrebirth wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:56 pm Really wanted Spence-Thurman, but I'll take Spence-Porter...but please not on PPV!!!
At least we'll get a unification though.
- KiNg_DaDdY_2o9
- Posts: 2618
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:52 pm
- Location: NorCal
-
- Posts: 13041
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:53 pm
- J.J.Dillon
- TTR Challenge # 21 Champ
- Posts: 14436
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:28 pm
- Location: Northern California
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
Yeah. it was great until Haymon came on the scene and seemed to have incriminating photographs of Ross Greenburg or something. Then we started getting Andre Berto bum-of-the-month showcase cards.
Now, the fans' greatest hope is with DAZN.
- TopNotch86
- Posts: 8213
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:41 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Porter vs Spence...on PPV?
I will never pay for a porter fight.
"He's a fighter, I'm a fighter, if I'm better on that day, I win. That's just the way it goes. Someday, every fighter loses. Sooner or later, somebody comes along and they got your ticket. Too old, just wasn't your day, whatever the reason is. In the end, everybody gets beaten. The most you can hope for is that you stay on top a while. Be the best."
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:31 pm
Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2019/5/8/18 ... fox-august
Reports are saying this fight might be on Fox and not PPV. If this is true, this is really good news
Reports are saying this fight might be on Fox and not PPV. If this is true, this is really good news
-
- Posts: 9466
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:44 pm
- Location: Irvine, kali
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
might be the most pleasantly surprising news of the year.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
This is excellent news.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
After Spence/Garcia disappointed viewers almost nobody paid to watch the Crawford/Khan disappointment. Good news but they are only putting this on free TV because they have to, not cause they want to. No accolades from me for that. I mean, they are doing the right thing but it isn't like they have another viable option.
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:31 pm
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
What were the projected numbers for Spence vs. Garcia because I think this article said it did 350k.Cagiva9 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:30 pm After Spence/Garcia disappointed viewers almost nobody paid to watch the Crawford/Khan disappointment. Good news but they are only putting this on free TV because they have to, not cause they want to. No accolades from me for that. I mean, they are doing the right thing but it isn't like they have another viable option.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
It did pretty well but the fight stunk. I think the numbers for Crawford/Khan probably reflected fan's disappointment in that previous PPV. I do not think their mood has changed favorably since then is all I'm sayingTheSickness316 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:40 pmWhat were the projected numbers for Spence vs. Garcia because I think this article said it did 350k.Cagiva9 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:30 pm After Spence/Garcia disappointed viewers almost nobody paid to watch the Crawford/Khan disappointment. Good news but they are only putting this on free TV because they have to, not cause they want to. No accolades from me for that. I mean, they are doing the right thing but it isn't like they have another viable option.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
Yeah buying a stinker ppv will sour you on buying another
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
Showtime has this. Anyone with me? No?
I believe in you Shawn.
I believe in you Shawn.
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:31 pm
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
I don't think Garcia vs. Spence affected Crawford vs. Khan because most people saw how much of a mismatch Crawford vs. Khan was and I don't think the numbers would have been any better no matter what fight it was coming after. Besides, it's not like Crawford was that popular on PPV anyway. His lone PPV bombed. I think it did less than 50k.Cagiva9 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:52 pmIt did pretty well but the fight stunk. I think the numbers for Crawford/Khan probably reflected fan's disappointment in that previous PPV. I do not think their mood has changed favorably since then is all I'm sayingTheSickness316 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:40 pmWhat were the projected numbers for Spence vs. Garcia because I think this article said it did 350k.Cagiva9 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 4:30 pm After Spence/Garcia disappointed viewers almost nobody paid to watch the Crawford/Khan disappointment. Good news but they are only putting this on free TV because they have to, not cause they want to. No accolades from me for that. I mean, they are doing the right thing but it isn't like they have another viable option.
-
- Posts: 8230
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:50 pm
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
Really good news. We shouldn't have to be paying for any of this crap.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
Porter brings it and is a helluva good guy. His dad seems pretty solid too. I don't care what the naysayers say.... Shawn is up against a monster, but he will bring war.
-
- Posts: 8230
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:50 pm
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
I'd give the old Porter(the brawler/mauler), a better chance to beat Spence, than the new Porter(tries to box/look cute, but can't really do it). Porter will try to box, and get picked apart from the outside early, then Spence will break him down late, and possibly stop him.Porter brings it and is a helluva good guy. His dad seems pretty solid too. I don't care what the naysayers say.... Shawn is up against a monster, but he will bring war.
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
aaannd......so much for that
-
- Posts: 8230
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:50 pm
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
aaannd......so much for that
What happened?
Re: Spence vs. Porter on Fox?
Word is that the fight is off. Spence wants big money and they can't make it work on Fox. If it does get made it will be ppv on a later date.